(Sorry, just out of ignorance: is anyone allowed to come to the community sync? I googled around and it looks like the answer is yes, but I don't see a living schedule anywhere... If the answer is indeed yes, is there a form where I can sign up for the calendar invite?)
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher M Luciano <cmluci...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > +1 weekly > > On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" <ma...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 for > bi-weekly. > Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive thing > about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those who > "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!) > Thanks! > -- > *Marco Massenzio* > Distributed Systems Engineer > http://codetrips.com > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo wrote: > > +1 for weekly. > > > > Best Regards, > > Diana Arroyo > > darr...@us.ibm.com > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 > > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > xiao > ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 > > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > From: tommy xiao > > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM > > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > > > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first > > > place, as I suspect many others as well. > > > > > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and > > 5pm > > > or something like that.) > > > > > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent wrote: > > > > > > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) > > OK > > > > for UTC+8. > > > > > > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times > > to > > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean > > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a > > > week, > > > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west > > coast > > > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still > > > include > > > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at > > > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present. > > > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly > > > >> meetings have a chance. > > > >> > > > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on > > > the > > > >> calendar! > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 for weekly > > > >>> > > > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by > > > >> step > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> From: Jojy Varghese > > > >>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > > >>>> Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 > > > >>>> Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> +1 bi-weekly > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov < > > a...@mesosphere.com > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 Weekly > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> -Elizabeth > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann > > > wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a > > bit > > > to > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> see > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> how people are liking it. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu < > > gyliu...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>> > wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Guangya > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer < > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> always > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> reset > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> to biweekly. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya < > > > ka...@mesosphere.io > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht < > > > j...@mesosphere.io > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> haosd...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mcyp...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> bi-weekly > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks). > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> community > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> sync > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> today. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> meeting > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> won't > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> these > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> time > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> commitments. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> might > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> have! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht* > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer > > > >>> Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG > > > >>> +86-10-8245 4084 | mad...@cn.ibm.com | http://www.cguru.net > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Haosdent Huang > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Deshi Xiao > > Twitter: xds2000 > > E-mail: xiaods(AT)gmail.com > > > > > > > > -- Alex Theory is the first term in the Taylor series of practice. -- Thomas M Cover (1992)
