Ah sorry, next time will do that. Thanks Noah
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013, Noah Slater wrote: > The report should be posted to the list for approval before it's added to > the wiki, but no harm done. > > I have signed off on the report now. Thanks! > > > On 1 July 2013 20:33, Henry Saputra <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > I have updated the wiki for July report for MetaModel. > > > > Mentors, please review and check for approval. > > > > Feel free to let me know if you think we should add more to the report. > > > > I have checked for approval. > > > > - Henry > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Kasper Sørensen < > > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Trying to get an overview of what needs to be done for our first board > > > report of July. First question is ... Who will file the report? I am > > > guessing one of the mentors? > > > > > > My input for the report is a bit sparse still since it still feels a > bit > > > like we're waiting for the initial steps to take place with the source > > code > > > migration. This might be an issue to report though. > > > > > > We might also want to mention that since the Incubator accepted > > MetaModel, > > > there's obviously been a lot of attention around the project. I've > posted > > > some mentionings on TheServerSide.com and I'm putting the final touches > > on > > > an article for InfoQ.com as well (expected published later this week). > I > > > hope this will bring more people to the community. > > > > > > In terms of project development; Nothing has happened in terms of the > > > Apache codebase. But at the old location (eobjects.org) we did do a > > bugfix > > > release (3.4.4) for which each issue's revisions have been tracked [1] > so > > > that we can easily apply it to the Apache codebase when available. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Kasper > > > > > > [1] http://eobjects.org/trac/query?milestone=MetaModel+3.4.4 > > > > > > > > > -- > NS >
