I've asked InfoQ for those specific points/corrections.
2013/7/10 Arvind Prabhakar <[email protected]> > Thanks for sharing the link Henry. I glanced through this and have the > following recommendation: > > 1. While the project is undergoing incubation, such articles should > preferably be written as blog posts on ASF blog and then cross-posted > elsewhere. > 2. The project name MetaModel is now an ASF mark and should be qualified > when referenced for the first time e.g. "Apache MetaModel" > 3. For incubating projects, it is a requirement that any reference to them > have a disclaimer clearly articulated that identifies its incubation > status. For instance, adding a disclaimer such as this should suffice: > "Apache MetaModel is currently undergoing incubation at The Apache Software > Foundation. More information on this project is available at > http://incubator.apache.org/metamodel"; > 4. Last but not least, it is best to send any articles that need to be > published for internal review on the dev list and the [email protected] for review > feedback and approval in order to ensure compliance with branding policies > etc. > > For this particular article, since it has been published, I suggest > contacting the publisher to request addition of the disclaimer (#3) and > minor edit to make sure that the first mention of MetaModel is "Apache > MetaModel". > > Regards, > Arvind Prabhakar > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi Arvind, > > > > Thanks for your insight. > > I believe this is the link to the article > > http://www.infoq.com/articles/apache-incubator-metamodel > > > > Looks like it is focusing more on what is metamodel instead of ASF and > > incubating itself. > > > > Let me know if you guys think we need to contact ASF press team about > this. > > > > Thx, > > > > Henry > > > > > > On Monday, July 8, 2013, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > > > > > Thanks Henry for posting the report. My apologies for not being able to > > > chime in sooner - I was away from email for the last couple of weeks. > > > > > > Although I am signing off on the report, I want to draw your attention > to > > > the Incubator branding guidelines noted in [1]. Specifically, the > > Incubator > > > places severe restrictions on what can be publicly announced when the > > > project is incubating. I call this out because I see the mention of > > > TheServerSide.com and InfoQ.com. > > > > > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html > > > > > > It will be helpful if you can send us a link to what was published so > > that > > > we can glance through it and provide any feedback. Also, please pardon > me > > > if you have already sent it - I am just starting to go through my email > > > backlog and have not reach all of them yet. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Arvind Prabhakar > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Matt Franklin < > [email protected] > > <javascript:;> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Henry Saputra < > [email protected] > > <javascript:;> > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > I believe once podling has been approved to join incubator the PPMC > > > > members > > > > > are the mentors and initial committers > > > > > > > > > > > > Correct > > > > > > > > > >
