+1 to checkstyle.  Maybe even tackle that effort project-by-project instead
of one giant PR.  But however it gets done, its got to get done.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Michael Miklavcic <
[email protected]> wrote:

> For 3, I think we should implement checkstyle, perform a one-time mass
> normalization check-in, and then move forward from there. Right now we are
> at the whim of individual preferences. I don't have a huge issue with this
> in incubation and while features and architecture rapidly change, but we
> should settle down as we approach maturity.
>
> On Nov 29, 2016 4:10 PM, "Matt Foley" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > 1. I think we need to emphasize good unit testing more.  I guess
> METRON-37
> > integrated Cobertura with our build process, but how often does it run
> and
> > where is JUnit code coverage reported?
> >
> > 2. Regarding the missing Code Style Guidelines, I’ve always thought the
> > Hadoop Style guide was good: short and sweet, and relatively easy to
> agree
> > to (for such a deeply “religious” topic :-)  See
> https://wiki.apache.org/
> > hadoop/CodeReviewChecklist  The core of it is simply “use Sun's code
> > conventions < http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/
> > documentation/codeconvtoc-136057.html > except indentation is 2 spaces,
> > not 4”.
> >
> > 3. Other useful things:
> > - In a PR, maintain the existing style of the file.
> > - Don’t combine code changes with lots of edits of whitespace or
> comments;
> > it makes code review too difficult.  It’s okay to fix an occasional
> comment
> > or indenting, but if wholesale comment or whitespace changes are needed,
> > make them a separate PR.
> >
> > 4. How about mandating Javadoc comments for all public APIs, and
> > generating Javadocs for release builds?  I’m a big fan of this, and it
> > isn’t much effort on an on-going basis; we did it in Hadoop.  This is how
> > you scale “self-documenting code” as you get past a few tens of KLOC –
> good
> > comments and transparent coding make the code self-documenting at the
> small
> > scale, Javadocs make the system self-summarizing at the large scale.
> > Metron is now about 66 KLOC, just line-counting Java files and
> subtracting
> > the ASF License headers (admittedly not excluding other whitespace or
> > comments – but there aren’t that many comments! :-)  I’d be willing to
> help
> > with retroactive cleanup, if there was support for the idea.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --Matt
> >
> >
> > On 11/29/16, 1:20 PM, "James Sirota" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     We have a really old (and incomplete) coding guidelines document that
> > I'd like to clean up prior to our graduation.  Does anyone have anything
> in
> > particular they wanted to add/change about this document?  Please post
> > suggestions to this thread and I will incorporate them
> >
> >     https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/
> > Development+Guidelines
> >
> >     -------------------
> >     Thank you,
> >
> >     James Sirota
> >     PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating)
> >     jsirota AT apache DOT org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Nick Allen <[email protected]>

Reply via email to