On 5/25/07, John Preston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My thought was that when comparing Glassfish that is built on top of Grizzly, and Tomcat with it own NIO engine you only get 10% improvement. But when you compare AsyncWeb on top of MINA or Grizzly you get a 50% difference. That would tell me that MINA is way slower than the IO engine for Tomcat. But I haven't seen this.
AsyncWeb has its own request-response pipeline, and I found it causes performance slowdown. I made the pipeline optional and AsyncWeb protocol codec work directly with MINA, and was able to get much better performance test result. BTW, I'm not sure about non-keepalive connections, because I couldn't test properly due to TIME_WAIT limitation. HTH, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
