I would prefer 'IoBuffer', which meshes nicely with IoSession, etc. It also removes the similarity from ByteBuffer since some seemed to frown on that.
----- Original Message ---- From: Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dev@mina.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:14:56 PM Subject: New name for ByteBuffer? Hi folks, It is often confusing to discriminate MINA ByteBuffer and NIO ByteBuffer. Do we need renaming? I didn't have much difficulties actually because most Java code doesn't use both types at the same time. There was an opinion about renaming it to MinaByteBuffer, but I don't think it's the best name available for us. I think DataBuffer, ExtendedByteBuffer, ExtendedBuffer or just Buffer might also be a candidate. There's Buffer in NIO, too, but nobody uses that class directly. I'd like to find the best name; short and not confusing one. Please don't hesitate to respond to this message with your idea so we can find out the best alternative. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658
