After reading this thread over and giving it some thought, I like
IoBuffer best. It's the most consistent with the rest of the API.
DataBuffer would be my second pick.
-Mike
Trustin Lee wrote:
Hi folks,
It is often confusing to discriminate MINA ByteBuffer and NIO
ByteBuffer. Do we need renaming? I didn't have much difficulties
actually because most Java code doesn't use both types at the same
time.
There was an opinion about renaming it to MinaByteBuffer, but I don't
think it's the best name available for us. I think DataBuffer,
ExtendedByteBuffer, ExtendedBuffer or just Buffer might also be a
candidate. There's Buffer in NIO, too, but nobody uses that class
directly.
I'd like to find the best name; short and not confusing one. Please
don't hesitate to respond to this message with your idea so we can
find out the best alternative.
Trustin
