On 10/25/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/24/07, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/23/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/23/07, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Some comments:
> > > >
> > > > 1) I understand your worries about performance impact but I think we
> > > should
> > > > to a little benchmark before jumping to conclusions. Maybe you
> already
> > > did
> > > > ?
> > >
> > > Good idea.  I didn't do any benchmark yet.  But my primary concern is
> > > not performance now.  It's impedance mismatch.  I feel like we are
> > > working around the problem.  We can go as we discussed so far, but
> > > it's also a lot of fun to explore another possibility.  Please don't
> > > get me wrong.  :)
> > >
> > > > 2) I was planning to create an Enum of all the keys that
> > > MdcInjectionFilter
> > > > supports (remoteAddress, remotePort,...)
> > > > and add a constructor that takes an EnumSet, that way users can
> minimize
> > > the
> > > > size of the map.
> > >
> > > That would be really nice.
> >
> > Done, please review.
>
> Great job!  I've done some additional tweak:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=588153
>
> Please review. ;)


Yes, much better, thanks  (and I should have cleaned up that unused code
myself)

I am not sure getProperty should fall back to values in the MDC though.

regards
Maarten

Cheers,
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
>

Reply via email to