AsyncWeb and Jeff's AsyncHttpClient are different projects. Anyways, Jeff is free to modify the trunk, which already contains AsyncHttpClient, whenever he wants. He made some big changes in Geronimo sandbox before I made some big changes in his original contribution, and that's why it's taking some time. So.. Jeff will migrate the code to the trunk eventually I guess.
IMHO, AsyncWeb itself, being David (Irving) the original contributor of the project, needs more work and more contributor(s) to become a part of the trunk because David seems to be too busy to follow up the subproject for now unfortunately. Where are you David? We miss you so much! :) Trustin On Jan 10, 2008 6:16 AM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Jeff started working on some of it over at MINA btw. Excuse the > cross post. > > Alex > > On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in > > it? Seems like a logical fit. That said, I think Genender boy wanted > > to melt some metal when he started this work. If it remains without a > > home I'd put it in components and let folks pick it up if they are > > interested. > > > > On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > > > >> #3 is okay with me. Was just thinking that #2 (plugin) would allow > > >> us to expose it on our plugin website and allow other users to just > > >> place a dependency on it in their plugins.... > > > > > > Oops. Got distracted and forgot to reply... > > > > > > I was thinking that AHC functionality could be released under > > > components (and thus easier to consume by other projects). We can > > > then create a plugin which includes this component. So, really a > > > combination of 2 and 3. > > > > > > --kevan > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> -Donald > > >> > > >> Kevan Miller wrote: > > >>> On Jan 5, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > >>>> There has been a lot of ongoing work by Jeff, Prasad, Rick, > > >>>> Sangjin and others on the AsyncHttpClient (aka. AHC) code in the > > >>>> sandbox and I'd like to start the discussion on moving it from > > >>>> sandbox into trunk. > > >>>> > > >>>> There are a couple options as to where it could reside - > > >>>> 1) under server/trunk/applications > > >>>> 2) under server/trunk/plugins > > >>>> 3) under geronimo/components/ > > >>>> > > >>>> What are everyone's thoughts? I'd like to get this into our 2.1 > > >>>> release and possibly into the 2.0.x branch if time allows. > > >>> Personally, I don't think it should go into server/trunk. > > >>> There's a 4'th option -- create a subproject (e.g. geronimo/ahc). > > >>> The only real difference, between this and 3) is web site, jira, > > >>> etc. > > >>> At the moment, I'm leaning towards 3) -- geronimo/components/ahc > > >>> (or some more descriptive name), but could probably be swayed... > > >>> --kevan > > > > > > > > > > > -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
