On Jan 9, 2008 4:57 PM, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AsyncWeb and Jeff's AsyncHttpClient are different projects. Anyways, > Jeff is free to modify the trunk, which already contains > AsyncHttpClient, whenever he wants. >
I know that. You obviously missed why I posted this information. The AsyncHttpClient code Jeff worked on in his Geronimo sandbox is about to get forked over to some other project. The Geronimo folks are looking for a home for it. I wanted people in general to know that Jeff is here working on that stuff. Makes sense? Alex > > On Jan 10, 2008 6:16 AM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think Jeff started working on some of it over at MINA btw. Excuse the > > cross post. > > > > Alex > > > > On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in > > > it? Seems like a logical fit. That said, I think Genender boy wanted > > > to melt some metal when he started this work. If it remains without a > > > home I'd put it in components and let folks pick it up if they are > > > interested. > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > > > > > >> #3 is okay with me. Was just thinking that #2 (plugin) would allow > > > >> us to expose it on our plugin website and allow other users to just > > > >> place a dependency on it in their plugins.... > > > > > > > > Oops. Got distracted and forgot to reply... > > > > > > > > I was thinking that AHC functionality could be released under > > > > components (and thus easier to consume by other projects). We can > > > > then create a plugin which includes this component. So, really a > > > > combination of 2 and 3. > > > > > > > > --kevan > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -Donald > > > >> > > > >> Kevan Miller wrote: > > > >>> On Jan 5, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > >>>> There has been a lot of ongoing work by Jeff, Prasad, Rick, > > > >>>> Sangjin and others on the AsyncHttpClient (aka. AHC) code in the > > > >>>> sandbox and I'd like to start the discussion on moving it from > > > >>>> sandbox into trunk. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> There are a couple options as to where it could reside - > > > >>>> 1) under server/trunk/applications > > > >>>> 2) under server/trunk/plugins > > > >>>> 3) under geronimo/components/ > > > >>>> > > > >>>> What are everyone's thoughts? I'd like to get this into our 2.1 > > > >>>> release and possibly into the 2.0.x branch if time allows. > > > >>> Personally, I don't think it should go into server/trunk. > > > >>> There's a 4'th option -- create a subproject (e.g. geronimo/ahc). > > > >>> The only real difference, between this and 3) is web site, jira, > > > >>> etc. > > > >>> At the moment, I'm leaning towards 3) -- geronimo/components/ahc > > > >>> (or some more descriptive name), but could probably be swayed... > > > >>> --kevan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > -- > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 >
