Trustin Lee wrote: > AsyncWeb and Jeff's AsyncHttpClient are different projects. Anyways, > Jeff is free to modify the trunk, which already contains > AsyncHttpClient, whenever he wants. He made some big changes in > Geronimo sandbox before I made some big changes in his original > contribution, and that's why it's taking some time. So.. Jeff will > migrate the code to the trunk eventually I guess.
Yes I will ;-) I am swamped at the moment...but I will ;-) Jeff > > IMHO, AsyncWeb itself, being David (Irving) the original contributor > of the project, needs more work and more contributor(s) to become a > part of the trunk because David seems to be too busy to follow up the > subproject for now unfortunately. Where are you David? We miss you > so much! :) > > Trustin > > On Jan 10, 2008 6:16 AM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think Jeff started working on some of it over at MINA btw. Excuse the >> cross post. >> >> Alex >> >> On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in >>> it? Seems like a logical fit. That said, I think Genender boy wanted >>> to melt some metal when he started this work. If it remains without a >>> home I'd put it in components and let folks pick it up if they are >>> interested. >>> >>> On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>> >>>> On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Donald Woods wrote: >>>> >>>>> #3 is okay with me. Was just thinking that #2 (plugin) would allow >>>>> us to expose it on our plugin website and allow other users to just >>>>> place a dependency on it in their plugins.... >>>> Oops. Got distracted and forgot to reply... >>>> >>>> I was thinking that AHC functionality could be released under >>>> components (and thus easier to consume by other projects). We can >>>> then create a plugin which includes this component. So, really a >>>> combination of 2 and 3. >>>> >>>> --kevan >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Donald >>>>> >>>>> Kevan Miller wrote: >>>>>> On Jan 5, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >>>>>>> There has been a lot of ongoing work by Jeff, Prasad, Rick, >>>>>>> Sangjin and others on the AsyncHttpClient (aka. AHC) code in the >>>>>>> sandbox and I'd like to start the discussion on moving it from >>>>>>> sandbox into trunk. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are a couple options as to where it could reside - >>>>>>> 1) under server/trunk/applications >>>>>>> 2) under server/trunk/plugins >>>>>>> 3) under geronimo/components/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What are everyone's thoughts? I'd like to get this into our 2.1 >>>>>>> release and possibly into the 2.0.x branch if time allows. >>>>>> Personally, I don't think it should go into server/trunk. >>>>>> There's a 4'th option -- create a subproject (e.g. geronimo/ahc). >>>>>> The only real difference, between this and 3) is web site, jira, >>>>>> etc. >>>>>> At the moment, I'm leaning towards 3) -- geronimo/components/ahc >>>>>> (or some more descriptive name), but could probably be swayed... >>>>>> --kevan >>>> >>> > > >
