Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Trustin Lee wrote:
1) Should all three's groupId be 'org.apache.mina', or should the two
have different groupIds like 'org.apache.mina.http' and
'org.apache.mina.ftp'? I have no particular preference here.
Having subprojects in "sub-groupIds" makes most sense to me.
org.apache.mina.ftp seems perfectly appropriate for FtpServer.
Seems good to me. Simple, and reflect exactly what the group is all about.
On a related note, what should be the name of FtpServer? Previously,
at the incubator, it has been called "Apache FtpServer" and this is
still reflected on the site, in POMs and so on. Should we keep this
name or choose a new?
Keep it simple. Apache FTP Server helps to understand that it's an FTP
server and it's delivered by Apache. Exotic names make it difficult to
remember for our users. I personally find that we are using too many of
those strange names (Cayenne, Felix, Forrest, Lenya ...) (This is a
personal opinion, of course).
And it will avoid a lot of refactoring of poms, site, doco...
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
