I agree with Alex. +1 for org.apache.ftpserver and org.apache.asyncweb for groupIds.
As far as artifactIds go, I like 'mina-filter-codec-http' since it's descriptive of what that code is doing. For ahc and asyncweb, I think simplest is best. Something like 'http-client' and 'http-server' is simple, concise, and descriptive. I haven't written any code for asyncWeb or ahc so take my suggestions with a grain of salt. -Mike Alex Karasulu wrote: > Hi, > > I remember some insisting that while MINA was at Directory it should use > org.apache.mina so that users will not have to change their code upon > graduation. This was pushed early in the beginning when MINA was just > forming even before the possibility of graduation in sight. There was > staunch resistance to using org.apache.directory.mina as the base package > name as well as using org.apache.directory.mina for the groupId. > > I think asyncweb has the potential to grow into it's own TLP one day. > Should any subproject with these intentions, like MINA did, be allowed to > carve out it's own groupId and it's own package base? > > Alex > > On Jan 24, 2008 9:05 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Niklas Gustavsson wrote: >>> Trustin Lee wrote: >>>> 1) Should all three's groupId be 'org.apache.mina', or should the two >>>> have different groupIds like 'org.apache.mina.http' and >>>> 'org.apache.mina.ftp'? I have no particular preference here. >>> Having subprojects in "sub-groupIds" makes most sense to me. >>> org.apache.mina.ftp seems perfectly appropriate for FtpServer. >> Seems good to me. Simple, and reflect exactly what the group is all about. >>> On a related note, what should be the name of FtpServer? Previously, >>> at the incubator, it has been called "Apache FtpServer" and this is >>> still reflected on the site, in POMs and so on. Should we keep this >>> name or choose a new? >> Keep it simple. Apache FTP Server helps to understand that it's an FTP >> server and it's delivered by Apache. Exotic names make it difficult to >> remember for our users. I personally find that we are using too many of >> those strange names (Cayenne, Felix, Forrest, Lenya ...) (This is a >> personal opinion, of course). >> >> And it will avoid a lot of refactoring of poms, site, doco... >> >> -- >> -- >> cordialement, regards, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.iktek.com >> directory.apache.org >> >> >> >
