Alex Karasulu wrote:
<snip/>
I think asyncweb has the potential to grow into it's own TLP one day.
Should any subproject with these intentions, like MINA did, be allowed to
carve out it's own groupId and it's own package base?
Makes sense. What we dd for MINA when it was a Directory Subproject
should also be done for FtpServer and Asyncweb, for the very same reason.
So I change my mind :
org.apache.ftpserver is far better than org.apache.mina.ftpserver
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
