On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:27:06 +0300 "Cem Uzunlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it would definitely be a very good option. > > 2008/5/6 "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > > > There's an obvious situation that a user doesn't want WriteFuture at > > all. In such a case, we could save pretty much amount of memory per > > each write request by not creating WriteFuture. > > > > Not sure if this will interfere with existing IoFilters though. > > -- > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > > -- > > what we call human nature is actually human habit > > -- > > http://gleamynode.net/ > > > > So we can introduce void write(..); and WriteFuture writeWithFuture(..); ?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
