Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:27:06 +0300
"Cem Uzunlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, it would definitely be a very good option.
2008/5/6 "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
There's an obvious situation that a user doesn't want WriteFuture at
all. In such a case, we could save pretty much amount of memory per
each write request by not creating WriteFuture.
Not sure if this will interfere with existing IoFilters though.
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
So we can introduce
void write(..);
and
WriteFuture writeWithFuture(..);
or
WriteFuture write(..);
and
void writeAndForget(..);
Depends on which is the default (I don't know so don't ask)
-Eero Nevalainen
