Hi, IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an updated/cleaned website.
Julien Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, Jeff Genender <[email protected]> a écrit : > May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone > on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we > can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release > because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a > real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. > > I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast > it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. > > Thoughts? > > Jeff > > On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > > Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : > > > > DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a > > WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs > > DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in > > Windows Vista > > DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all > > sessions closed > > > > I think we should at least check the first one before launching a > > vote... > > > > > > Julien Vermillard a écrit : > >> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, > >> Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> > >> > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so > >>> far : > >>> > >>> > >>> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the > >>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig > >>> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the > >>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block > >>> until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced] > >>> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/ > >>> filter/reqres > >>> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x > >>> and 2.x > >>> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery > >>> attempts : Improve documentation > >>> > >>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my > >>> opinion is that we are ready for a release. > >>> > >>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA > >>> version and launch a vote ? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Cordialement, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.nextury.com > > > > > -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
