On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Julien Vermillard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the > PR stuff implying the 2.0 release. > it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an > updated/cleaned website.
Sorry ! didn't get much :-( Can we list down what all we need to do like cleanup and other stuff, so that its easy. One thing I can think off is moving out the 1.0 documentation to achieve. Sorry for the dumb question :-) > Julien > > Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700, > Jeff Genender <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone >> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we >> can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release >> because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a >> real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes. >> >> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast >> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Jeff >> >> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >> > Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too : >> > >> > DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a >> > WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs >> > DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in >> > Windows Vista >> > DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all >> > sessions closed >> > >> > I think we should at least check the first one before launching a >> > vote... >> > >> > >> > Julien Vermillard a écrit : >> >> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100, >> >> Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>
