Le Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:10:12 +0530, Ashish <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > since day one, I found that Acceptor/Connector are technical names, > > not user friendly names. > > > > Let's face the real world : we are not developping Acceptors, not > > Connectors, but Servers and Clients. Can't we rename those two guys > > to IoServer and IoClient instead of IoAcceptor and IoConnector ? > > > > I know this is just cosmetic, but if it helps people to understand > > the kind of objects they are manipulating, I think it would worth > > the change... > > > > thoughts ? > > > > +1 on name change > > Have a little hesitation with IoServer/IoClient, it kindof gives an > impression of complete implementation, but don't have a better > suggestion either > an IoServier With an IoHandler and the chain is a complete implementation no ? -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
