On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Julien Vermillard <[email protected]> wrote: > Le Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:10:12 +0530, > Ashish <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > since day one, I found that Acceptor/Connector are technical names, >> > not user friendly names. >> > >> > Let's face the real world : we are not developping Acceptors, not >> > Connectors, but Servers and Clients. Can't we rename those two guys >> > to IoServer and IoClient instead of IoAcceptor and IoConnector ? >> > >> > I know this is just cosmetic, but if it helps people to understand >> > the kind of objects they are manipulating, I think it would worth >> > the change... >> > >> > thoughts ? >> > >> >> +1 on name change >> >> Have a little hesitation with IoServer/IoClient, it kindof gives an >> impression of complete implementation, but don't have a better >> suggestion either >> > > an IoServier With an IoHandler and the chain is a complete > implementation no ? > > -- > Julien Vermillard
hmm.. yeah didn't thought this way.. :-) Hey are we planning this in 2.0 or 3.0?
