Le Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:17:49 +0530, Ashish <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Julien Vermillard > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:10:12 +0530, > > Ashish <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi guys, > >> > > >> > since day one, I found that Acceptor/Connector are technical > >> > names, not user friendly names. > >> > > >> > Let's face the real world : we are not developping Acceptors, not > >> > Connectors, but Servers and Clients. Can't we rename those two > >> > guys to IoServer and IoClient instead of IoAcceptor and > >> > IoConnector ? > >> > > >> > I know this is just cosmetic, but if it helps people to > >> > understand the kind of objects they are manipulating, I think it > >> > would worth the change... > >> > > >> > thoughts ? > >> > > >> > >> +1 on name change > >> > >> Have a little hesitation with IoServer/IoClient, it kindof gives an > >> impression of complete implementation, but don't have a better > >> suggestion either > >> > > > > an IoServier With an IoHandler and the chain is a complete > > implementation no ? > > > > -- > > Julien Vermillard > > hmm.. yeah didn't thought this way.. :-) > > Hey are we planning this in 2.0 or 3.0? in 3.0 because 2.0 API is frozen -- Julien Vermillard Archean Technologies http://www.archean.fr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
