On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/13/10 11:43 PM, Maarten Bosteels wrote: > Then 30 minutes later, it passes. I have no idea why it behaves this > way, but this is systematic, and not only for MINA, but also for Vysper, > FtpServer and so on.
This is not true, at least not for Vysper and FtpServer. There are two types of issues we've seen in Hudson in these two projects: * Failed builds due to Hudson stability problems. These are easily recognized since the build will fail with a Hudson error rather then a build error. Typical example is a borked connection to a Hudson slave. For Vysper and FtpServer I try to clean these from Hudson history when they happen. * Failed builds due to build problems, recognized problems coming from the build, typically test failures. This seems to be the case with MINA on Windows at the moment. > Well, I think we should release a 2.0.0, and then fix issues as fast as we > can, releasing a 2.0.1 if needed. IMO, we have waited way too much for this > 2.0.0 Agreed. I think we could aim for a 2.0.1 within a month. But, of course I don't do much work on MINA itself so view this as some random user's opinion :-) /niklas
