On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 4/17/12 3:48 PM, Ashish a écrit :
>
>>> Our first approach here is first to get the minimal stack working for
>>> Socket, both client and server, with the correct processing of messages.
>>> We
>>> all know how the full thing works, so we can build MINA 3.0 with MINA 2.0
>>> in
>>> mind, but avoiding the errors that have been made. That means, we don't
>>> have
>>> to throw everything out of the windows, but if we like to do so, so be it
>>> :)
>>>
>>> One last thing, I'd like to have an incremental project, where an
>>> addition
>>> does not break what we already have added. I don't believe that a big
>>> bang
>>> approach is likely to work, I think that baby steps are way better. But
>>> if
>>> something that was added does not fit with a new idea you have, then
>>> let's
>>> churn the existing stack to fit your new ideas :)
>>
>> This makes sense. Don't intend to break anything or do something out
>> of the way. Just trying to figure out the baby steps to take.
>> We already have some samples working, so will try to play around and
>> figure out the next steps and of-course make some noises.
>
>
> Don't get me wrong : I'm not writing this to tell you to be cautious. I know
> you are. I just summarized the discussions we had when we started 3.0 as you
> were MIA lately.

Absolutely not :) I appreciate your insight into things and you are
always welcome to provide feedback.
I have known you for more than 3 yrs now :)
Incremental stuff is the way to go, build, try it out and see if it works.

I have got an idea to organize a Google Hangout to discuss about 3.0,
if people are interested. We can discuss and formulate a roadmap.
wdyt?

thanks
ashish

Reply via email to