Le 22/12/14 10:28, Jeff MAURY a écrit : > Given the fact that we introduced some kind of incompatibility (with 2.0.9 > or 2.0.10), don't you think it would be valuable to witch to 2.1.X ?
We probably should. My mistake would then be fixed.
Le 22/12/14 10:28, Jeff MAURY a écrit : > Given the fact that we introduced some kind of incompatibility (with 2.0.9 > or 2.0.10), don't you think it would be valuable to witch to 2.1.X ?
We probably should. My mistake would then be fixed.