Le 22/12/14 11:26, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit :
> Le 22/12/14 11:05, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit :
>> Le 22/12/14 10:28, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
>>> Given the fact that we introduced some kind of incompatibility (with 2.0.9
>>> or 2.0.10), don't you think it would be valuable to witch to 2.1.X ?
>> We probably should. My mistake would then be fixed.
>>
>>
> The real pb is that MOINA 2.0.8 broke the API, and if we switch to 2.1.0
> - the move we should have made back then - that would mean we should
> create a new branch 2.0.10 where we remove the change I intriduced in
> 2.0.8. Here is the
>
>
> 2.0.7 -+-> 2.0.8 (whith API change, wrong) --> 2.0.9 (still wrong) -->
> 2.0.10 (dead branch)
> | \ | \
> | \ | \
> +-------+------------------------------------+---------------->
> 2.0.10 (with a revert on the changed API)
> | |
> +---------------------------------------------+
>
> +--> 2.1.0 ( with the API change)
>
> So if we cut 2 releases :
> * 2.0.10 which contains the change done in 2.0.8 and 2.0.9 but rollback
> the changes in teh API done in 2.0.8
> * 2.1.0 which is a branch done based on 2.0.10 but with the change done
> in the API
>
> do you think that is a viable solution ?
>
>
Another option would be to add a new Interface in 2.0.10 that those who
want to benefit from the /inputClosed() event will have to implement. We
roll back the previous interface to what it was.
/
