Hi Xiaojing,

Thank you for your insights on this.

It is valuable for us to refer to those art of status engineering works for
the ML/AI domain. and looks very promising to have all AI/ML parameters,
dataset in memory storage to further accelerate the data process.

Let's further think about which steps we will take towards success. thanks.

Best regards
Gordon.


On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:21 PM Xiaojin Jiao <[email protected]> wrote:

> Quick thoughts :)
> Extend our Mnemonic interface to more advanced memory for AI.
> High-speed emerging memories for AI hardware accelerators | Nature Reviews
> Electrical Engineering <https://www.nature.com/articles/s44287-023-00002-9
> >
> <https://www.nature.com/articles/s44287-023-00002-9>How AI Impacts Memory
> Systems (semiengineering.com)
> <https://semiengineering.com/how-ai-impacts-memory-systems/>
> In-Memory Computing, AI Draws Research Interest - EE Times
> <https://www.eetimes.com/in-memory-computing-ai-draws-research-interest/>
> ------
> Best Regards,
>
>
> Xiaojin Jiao
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:01 AM Chenyang Li <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Ml/ai will be interesting to add, but the problem is I don’t see a clear
> > interception from Mnemonic project.
> >
> > Does anybody have any ideas on this?
> > Chenyang
> >
> >         < = >
> > LESS IS MORE
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:58 AM Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mnemonic contributors and PMCs,
> > >
> > > As the benefits of non-volatile memory technology are very limited on
> its
> > > own, we may need to consider developing some applications to present
> it,
> > > such as ML/AI. so I would like to call a vote to make a community wide
> > > decision on this new direction for Mnemonic, please vote, and we can
> > > definitely do further discussion on it after it, thanks.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly,
> > >
> > > [] +1 approve
> > > [] +0 no opinion
> > > [] -1 disapprove  with a reason
> > >
> > > Thank you all for your participation.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Gordon
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:56 PM Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Sander,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the late reply, I submitted the report for the Mnemonic
> > > > community and will discuss with our PMCs to make a decision on the
> > > > direction of our project/community, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Gordon.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 6:19 AM Sander Striker <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Dear Mnemonic community,
> > > >>
> > > >> In the Apache governance model, the ASF board delegates
> responsibility
> > > for
> > > >> managing projects to PMCs. This allows projects to govern
> themselves,
> > in
> > > >> terms
> > > >> of their own development goals, guidelines, and volunteer spirit,
> > within
> > > >> the
> > > >> scope of our purpose as an open source foundation. The state allows
> us
> > > to
> > > >> supply an umbrella of corporate protection to our projects and
> > > >> volunteers, but
> > > >> only to the extent that we retain active and effective oversight of
> > each
> > > >> project's operation on behalf of the public's interest.
> > > >>
> > > >> To enable the board to provide oversight across the foundation, each
> > PMC
> > > >> is
> > > >> tasked with providing the board a quarterly report on the health of
> > > their
> > > >> project. This allows us to hear your heartbeat, to see the project
> > > through
> > > >> your eyes, and to inform the public through our meeting minutes.
> > > >>
> > > >> The board has noticed that the reports for Mnemonic have been missed
> > > >> for a number of months. This makes us sad because we have lost that
> > > >> ability
> > > >> to communicate with you, to see what may be preventing your good
> > health,
> > > >> and to ensure that we are providing the services that you need to
> > > continue
> > > >> as an Apache project.
> > > >>
> > > >> The reports to the board are normally written by the PMC chair but
> all
> > > PMC
> > > >> members have an individual responsibility to ensure that a report is
> > > >> submitted. If the PMC chair is not available then any PMC member can
> > > >> submit
> > > >> the report. If you need help with this process, please reach out to
> > > >> [email protected]
> > > >>
> > > >> Please ensure that a report for Mnemonic is submitted to the board
> > > >> for the next meeting on Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 21:00 UTC.
> > > >>
> > > >> If the PMC chair is not going to be available for an extended period
> > of
> > > >> time,
> > > >> it may make sense to rotate the PMC chair. Rotating the PMC chair
> does
> > > not
> > > >> mean the current chair has failed. People's situations and interests
> > > >> change;
> > > >> rotation is good as it allows more people to become familiar with
> that
> > > >> role.
> > > >> Again, if assistance is required with this process, please feel free
> > to
> > > >> reach out to [email protected]
> > > >>
> > > >> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity
> > > >> reduces
> > > >> to a level that the project is no longer sustainable. At Apache,
> > > projects
> > > >> reach this stage when there are no longer 3 active PMC members
> > providing
> > > >> oversight. Projects that reach this stage are placed in our Attic,
> > where
> > > >> they continue to be accessible to the public but are not portrayed
> as
> > > >> having
> > > >> an active community for maintenance.
> > > >>
> > > >>     http://attic.apache.org/
> > > >>
> > > >> If Mnemonic has reached this point, please reach out to the Attic
> > > project
> > > >> to arrange transfer. On the other hand, if your project is mostly
> > > dormant
> > > >> but
> > > >> still has at least three active PMC members, it can remain in that
> > state
> > > >> for
> > > >> as long as needed. If your project is in such a state, please
> mention
> > > >> that in
> > > >> your report and verify the PMC's state at regular intervals.
> > > >>
> > > >> Finally, if you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to
> > > >> [email protected].
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> The ASF Board
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to