Thanks Zhen.
Right, it is also the most challenging technique we are going to achieve.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:45 AM rhythmwind <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1. Agree with Xiaojin's idea.
>
> If mnemonic project could provid a cost effective way to meet speed and
> capacity required by ever increasing demand of ML models, it will be much
> attractive.
>
> Thanks Zhen
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Gordon <[email protected]>
> Date: 3/21/24 10:16 AM (GMT-08:00)
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The new direction for project Mnemonic
>
> Thank you Xiaojing and Chenyang.
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 8:10 AM Chenyang Li <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok sound good to me then
> >
> > +1
> >
> >         < = >
> > LESS IS MORE
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:18 PM Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Chenyang,
> > >
> > > You are right, how to optimize the ML/AI workload through non-volatile
> > > objects is a big challenge.
> > >
> > > I saw some successful efforts on this domain, for example, Apache Arrow
> > > provided optimized dataframe and numpy array to accelerate the data
> > > processing, while they do have DLPack protocol to improve the
> efficiency
> > of
> > > tensors and arrays exchange between major frameworks.
> > >
> > > So that's why I think we might find the similar path to ML/AI
> workloads,
> > > thanks.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Gordon
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:01 AM Chenyang Li <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ml/ai will be interesting to add, but the problem is I don’t see a
> > clear
> > > > interception from Mnemonic project.
> > > >
> > > > Does anybody have any ideas on this?
> > > > Chenyang
> > > >
> > > >         < = >
> > > > LESS IS MORE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:58 AM Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Mnemonic contributors and PMCs,
> > > > >
> > > > > As the benefits of non-volatile memory technology are very limited
> on
> > > its
> > > > > own, we may need to consider developing some applications to
> present
> > > it,
> > > > > such as ML/AI. so I would like to call a vote to make a community
> > wide
> > > > > decision on this new direction for Mnemonic, please vote, and we
> can
> > > > > definitely do further discussion on it after it, thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly,
> > > > >
> > > > > [] +1 approve
> > > > > [] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [] -1 disapprove  with a reason
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you all for your participation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Gordon
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:56 PM Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Sander,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry for the late reply, I submitted the report for the Mnemonic
> > > > > > community and will discuss with our PMCs to make a decision on
> the
> > > > > > direction of our project/community, thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > Gordon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 6:19 AM Sander Striker <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Dear Mnemonic community,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> In the Apache governance model, the ASF board delegates
> > > responsibility
> > > > > for
> > > > > >> managing projects to PMCs. This allows projects to govern
> > > themselves,
> > > > in
> > > > > >> terms
> > > > > >> of their own development goals, guidelines, and volunteer
> spirit,
> > > > within
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> scope of our purpose as an open source foundation. The state
> > allows
> > > us
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> supply an umbrella of corporate protection to our projects and
> > > > > >> volunteers, but
> > > > > >> only to the extent that we retain active and effective oversight
> > of
> > > > each
> > > > > >> project's operation on behalf of the public's interest.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> To enable the board to provide oversight across the foundation,
> > each
> > > > PMC
> > > > > >> is
> > > > > >> tasked with providing the board a quarterly report on the health
> > of
> > > > > their
> > > > > >> project. This allows us to hear your heartbeat, to see the
> project
> > > > > through
> > > > > >> your eyes, and to inform the public through our meeting minutes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The board has noticed that the reports for Mnemonic have been
> > missed
> > > > > >> for a number of months. This makes us sad because we have lost
> > that
> > > > > >> ability
> > > > > >> to communicate with you, to see what may be preventing your good
> > > > health,
> > > > > >> and to ensure that we are providing the services that you need
> to
> > > > > continue
> > > > > >> as an Apache project.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The reports to the board are normally written by the PMC chair
> but
> > > all
> > > > > PMC
> > > > > >> members have an individual responsibility to ensure that a
> report
> > is
> > > > > >> submitted. If the PMC chair is not available then any PMC member
> > can
> > > > > >> submit
> > > > > >> the report. If you need help with this process, please reach out
> > to
> > > > > >> [email protected]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please ensure that a report for Mnemonic is submitted to the
> board
> > > > > >> for the next meeting on Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 21:00 UTC.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> If the PMC chair is not going to be available for an extended
> > period
> > > > of
> > > > > >> time,
> > > > > >> it may make sense to rotate the PMC chair. Rotating the PMC
> chair
> > > does
> > > > > not
> > > > > >> mean the current chair has failed. People's situations and
> > interests
> > > > > >> change;
> > > > > >> rotation is good as it allows more people to become familiar
> with
> > > that
> > > > > >> role.
> > > > > >> Again, if assistance is required with this process, please feel
> > free
> > > > to
> > > > > >> reach out to [email protected]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where
> > activity
> > > > > >> reduces
> > > > > >> to a level that the project is no longer sustainable. At Apache,
> > > > > projects
> > > > > >> reach this stage when there are no longer 3 active PMC members
> > > > providing
> > > > > >> oversight. Projects that reach this stage are placed in our
> Attic,
> > > > where
> > > > > >> they continue to be accessible to the public but are not
> portrayed
> > > as
> > > > > >> having
> > > > > >> an active community for maintenance.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>     http://attic.apache.org/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> If Mnemonic has reached this point, please reach out to the
> Attic
> > > > > project
> > > > > >> to arrange transfer. On the other hand, if your project is
> mostly
> > > > > dormant
> > > > > >> but
> > > > > >> still has at least three active PMC members, it can remain in
> that
> > > > state
> > > > > >> for
> > > > > >> as long as needed. If your project is in such a state, please
> > > mention
> > > > > >> that in
> > > > > >> your report and verify the PMC's state at regular intervals.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Finally, if you have any questions, please feel free to reach
> out
> > to
> > > > > >> [email protected].
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> The ASF Board
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to