It seems to stem from 1 jira - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-57

I missed the vote against 2.1, I would have voted -1 just because of the
above jira.

BTW, I field about 3 direct emails about cobertura-maven-plugin 2.1 a
day now.  I recommend that to all people to downgrade to 2.0 for the
time being.

We can probably revert MCOBERTURA-57 and release 2.1.1 as a short term fix.
The long term fix for MCOBERTURA-57 has recently been checked in at the
cobertura (non-plugin) subversion at sourceforge.net

- Joakim Erdfelt

Brett Porter wrote:
> I'm seeing complaints that 2.1 doesn't work. Did all those that voted
> test it? Are these isolated incidents, or is there something
> fundamentally wrong with the release?
>
> On 12/12/2006, at 1:33 AM, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I would like to release the cobertura-maven-plugin: there have been
>> few changes since the last release but those changes could be really
>> useful to users, so I don't want to delay a release any further.
>>
>> The list of changes is at:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
>>
>>
>> my +1
>>
>> fabrizio
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to