I should have them fixed (and this back working on 1.4 once I get home) On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Stephen Connolly < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ahh stringBuilder's > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Stephen Connolly < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The machine I'm on was failing to resolve mojo version 18... so I went >> with mojo 17 (I can try again when I get home) >> >> As regards 1.5 vs 1.4... >> >> My aim is for this to run on 1.4.... I'm guessing that woodstox is 1.5 >> only as I don't think I've included any java 1.5 methods (though I could be >> wrong) >> >> I want to keep the code 1.4 and get a version that works with 1,.4 out >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Stephen Connolly wrote: >>> >>> The plugin's POM declare compiler source/target to be 1.4 but actually >>>>> requires Java 1.5 to compile/run. >>>>> >>>> >>>> done >>>> >>> >>> Hm? The POM still does not state source/target to be 1.5. Likewise, the >>> "Plugin Documentation" report erroneously prints "System Requirements" "JDK: >>> 1.4". >>> >>> Out of curiousity: Did you encounter problems with the mojo-parent:18 or >>> why did you downgrade to mojo:17? If the parent POM has defects, we should >>> better know such that we can fix it. >>> >>> >>> Benjamin >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> >>> >> >
