Or to put it another way:

For the next cycle, I have an itch that needs a JDK 1.4 version of
this plugin... So I'm more than happy to scratch that itch for at
least one full release of the versions-maven-plugin...

After that point I will see if I still have an itch, or if there are
compelling reasons to move to JDK 1.5 (given that AFAIK maven-model is
JDK 1.4 at the moment I suspect you'd just end up with a load of
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") all over the place)

;-)

-Stephen

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Stephen Connolly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it's working with 1.4 now
>
> once I've got 1.0 released I'll move to 1.5 (assuming there is an easy
> way to ensure somebody working on code that must work with 1.4 can
> continue to use the 1.0 version)
>
> On 9/2/08, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> since this is a brand new plugin, can we just go ahead with 1.5?
>>
>> -D
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Connolly
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Yeah it will work with JDK 1.4 (woodstox works on 1.4, just the IDE ran
>>> away
>>> and added string builders not buffers)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Connolly
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I should have them fixed (and this back working on 1.4 once I get home)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Stephen Connolly
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ahh stringBuilder's
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Stephen Connolly
>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The machine I'm on was failing to resolve mojo version 18... so I went
>>>>>> with mojo 17 (I can try again when I get home)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As regards 1.5 vs 1.4...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My aim is for this to run on 1.4.... I'm guessing that woodstox is 1.5
>>>>>> only as I don't think I've included any java 1.5 methods (though I
>>>>>> could be
>>>>>> wrong)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I want to keep the code 1.4 and get a version that works with 1,.4 out
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stephen Connolly wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The plugin's POM declare compiler source/target to be 1.4 but
>>>>>>>>> actually
>>>>>>>>> requires Java 1.5 to compile/run.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hm? The POM still does not state source/target to be 1.5. Likewise,
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> "Plugin Documentation" report erroneously prints "System Requirements"
>>>>>>> "JDK:
>>>>>>> 1.4".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Out of curiousity: Did you encounter problems with the mojo-parent:18
>>>>>>> or why did you downgrade to mojo:17? If the parent POM has defects, we
>>>>>>> should better know such that we can fix it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Benjamin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to