Yeah it will work with JDK 1.4 (woodstox works on 1.4, just the IDE ran away and added string builders not buffers)
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Connolly < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I should have them fixed (and this back working on 1.4 once I get home) > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Stephen Connolly < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ahh stringBuilder's >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Stephen Connolly < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The machine I'm on was failing to resolve mojo version 18... so I went >>> with mojo 17 (I can try again when I get home) >>> >>> As regards 1.5 vs 1.4... >>> >>> My aim is for this to run on 1.4.... I'm guessing that woodstox is 1.5 >>> only as I don't think I've included any java 1.5 methods (though I could be >>> wrong) >>> >>> I want to keep the code 1.4 and get a version that works with 1,.4 out >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Stephen Connolly wrote: >>>> >>>> The plugin's POM declare compiler source/target to be 1.4 but actually >>>>>> requires Java 1.5 to compile/run. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> done >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hm? The POM still does not state source/target to be 1.5. Likewise, the >>>> "Plugin Documentation" report erroneously prints "System Requirements" >>>> "JDK: >>>> 1.4". >>>> >>>> Out of curiousity: Did you encounter problems with the mojo-parent:18 or >>>> why did you downgrade to mojo:17? If the parent POM has defects, we should >>>> better know such that we can fix it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Benjamin >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
