On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:06 +0100
Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote:
> -0
> Tested with jboss-packaging-m-p and it builds and the site is
> produced. BUT, I see the same things on jboss-packaging-m-p as
> Roberts. Also, the reports are not listed in the left hand menu in
> alphebetical order any longer (might be a site plugin issue?).
I did not update the site-m-p to 3.0, there is still some issues
on it and we should probably go back to a 3.0-beta-3 version?
For the license-m-p I use the beta-3 version which still works fine...
For the checkstyle problem, as mojo project should be single module
does it feel ok to just set the not aggregated report ?
Should I cancel right now the release and fix problem to start a second
fresh release ?
>
> /Anders
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:38, Robert Scholte
> <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote:
> > Thanks for picking this up!
> >
> > But... I've tried it on jdiff-m-p and it suddenly has 2 checkstyle
> > report entries: a basic and an aggregate report.
> > Since we're talking about the parent-pom here I have to say -1.
> > I've heard there are some problems with surefire/failsafe reports
> > since 2.10 too (maybe someone can confirm this...), at least worth
> > checking.
Could we then use the 2.9 version ?
Tony.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
