On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:16:05 +0000 Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote:
Ok vote canceled, will fix today problem and launch a new one. - checkstyle problem it is already fixed. - for m-surefire-p, we could go back to previous version 2.9 - for m-site-p, I will feel more confortable to go back to 3.0-beta-3 (unfortunaly) see for example http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MLICENSE-26 I do this stuff and relaunch a new release. Thanks for your vigilance guys. Tony. > > I agree -Robert > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:02:12 +0100 > > From: and...@hammar.net > > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release mojo-parent version 29 and > > mojo-sandbox-parent 10 > > > > Yes, I think we should cancel and fix. > > > > /Anders > > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 19:27, Tony Chemit <che...@codelutin.com> > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:06 +0100 > > > Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote: > > > > > >> -0 > > >> Tested with jboss-packaging-m-p and it builds and the site is > > >> produced. BUT, I see the same things on jboss-packaging-m-p as > > >> Roberts. Also, the reports are not listed in the left hand menu > > >> in alphebetical order any longer (might be a site plugin issue?). > > > I did not update the site-m-p to 3.0, there is still some issues > > > on it and we should probably go back to a 3.0-beta-3 version? > > > > > > For the license-m-p I use the beta-3 version which still works > > > fine... > > > > > > For the checkstyle problem, as mojo project should be single > > > module does it feel ok to just set the not aggregated report ? > > > > > > Should I cancel right now the release and fix problem to start a > > > second fresh release ? > > > > > >> > > >> /Anders > > >> > > >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:38, Robert Scholte > > >> <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote: > > >> > Thanks for picking this up! > > >> > > > >> > But... I've tried it on jdiff-m-p and it suddenly has 2 > > >> > checkstyle report entries: a basic and an aggregate report. > > >> > Since we're talking about the parent-pom here I have to say -1. > > >> > I've heard there are some problems with surefire/failsafe > > >> > reports since 2.10 too (maybe someone can confirm this...), at > > >> > least worth checking. > > > > > > Could we then use the 2.9 version ? > > > > > > Tony. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > -- Tony Chemit -------------------- tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 email: che...@codelutin.com http://www.codelutin.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
