I agree -Robert

----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:02:12 +0100
> From: and...@hammar.net
> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release mojo-parent version 29 and 
> mojo-sandbox-parent 10
>
> Yes, I think we should cancel and fix.
>
> /Anders
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 19:27, Tony Chemit <che...@codelutin.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:06 +0100
> > Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote:
> >
> >> -0
> >> Tested with jboss-packaging-m-p and it builds and the site is
> >> produced. BUT, I see the same things on jboss-packaging-m-p as
> >> Roberts. Also, the reports are not listed in the left hand menu in
> >> alphebetical order any longer (might be a site plugin issue?).
> > I did not update the site-m-p to 3.0, there is still some issues
> > on it and we should probably go back to a 3.0-beta-3 version?
> >
> > For the license-m-p I use the beta-3 version which still works fine...
> >
> > For the checkstyle problem, as mojo project should be single module
> > does it feel ok to just set the not aggregated report ?
> >
> > Should I cancel right now the release and fix problem to start a second
> > fresh release ?
> >
> >>
> >> /Anders
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:38, Robert Scholte
> >> <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote:
> >> > Thanks for picking this up!
> >> >
> >> > But... I've tried it on jdiff-m-p and it suddenly has 2 checkstyle
> >> > report entries: a basic and an aggregate report.
> >> > Since we're talking about the parent-pom here I have to say -1.
> >> > I've heard there are some problems with surefire/failsafe reports
> >> > since 2.10 too (maybe someone can confirm this...), at least worth
> >> > checking.
> >
> > Could we then use the 2.9 version ?
> >
> > Tony.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >
> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>                                         

Reply via email to