On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:37:17 +0000 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote:
> What I did (and it confused users no end) is bind the string to a different > field and have that field filled using the property name... so that anyone > doing > > -Dfoo.bar=...,...,... > > would populate the string field > > but anyone doing > > <bars> > <bar>...</bar> > <bar>...</bar> > <bar>...</bar> > </bars> > > would be populating the String[] field. Hum, but actually, users can do <bars>...,...,...</bars> that's my problem. I could change as you tolld but it will break compat which can be ok perhaps ... -- Tony Chemit -------------------- tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 email: [email protected] http://www.codelutin.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
