On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:37:17 +0000
Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote:
> What I did (and it confused users no end) is bind the string to a different
> field and have that field filled using the property name... so that anyone
> doing
>
> -Dfoo.bar=...,...,...
>
> would populate the string field
>
> but anyone doing
>
> <bars>
> <bar>...</bar>
> <bar>...</bar>
> <bar>...</bar>
> </bars>
>
> would be populating the String[] field.
>
> Anyway it confuses the hell out of users
Yes, and BTW I need to keep the oldish way (for commandline parameter, or
property configuration way). So in fact there is nothing to remove.
tony.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
