Up the major version number so.
On 3 January 2013 13:44, Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:37:17 +0000 > Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What I did (and it confused users no end) is bind the string to a > different > > field and have that field filled using the property name... so that > anyone > > doing > > > > -Dfoo.bar=...,...,... > > > > would populate the string field > > > > but anyone doing > > > > <bars> > > <bar>...</bar> > > <bar>...</bar> > > <bar>...</bar> > > </bars> > > > > would be populating the String[] field. > > Hum, but actually, users can do > > <bars>...,...,...</bars> > > that's my problem. > > I could change as you tolld but it will break compat which can be ok > perhaps ... > > -- > Tony Chemit > -------------------- > tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 > email: [email protected] > http://www.codelutin.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
