Hi Anders,
> Why is the license stated as BSD in the pom? And why is the license text
the one from the JDepend project?
The original Link was:
<license>
<name>BSD</name>
<url>http://www.clarkware.com/software/license.txt</url>
</license>
</licenses>
which is not available and the link on JDepend Project was in my opinion
better...but you are right it might be better having ASF-2.0 license.
Looking at the source, at least one of the classes has an ASF-2.0
license header.
So i would assume all the files should have Apache Software Foundation
License 2.0 ?
I'm -1 for now.
Ok...
Fixed all files via mvn license:update-file-header...
All files now have ASF 2.0 license...
Any other things which i missed ?
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
