Should probably also be a LICENSE.txt file in the root. I'll add that. /Anders
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de>wrote: > Hi Anders, > > > > Why is the license stated as BSD in the pom? And why is the license text > >> the one from the JDepend project? >> > > The original Link was: > <license> > <name>BSD</name> > <url>http://www.clarkware.com/software/license.txt</url> > </license> > </licenses> > > which is not available and the link on JDepend Project was in my opinion > better...but you are right it might be better having ASF-2.0 license. > > > Looking at the source, at least one of the classes has an ASF-2.0 >> license header. >> > > So i would assume all the files should have Apache Software Foundation > License 2.0 ? > > > > >> I'm -1 for now. >> > Ok... > > Fixed all files via mvn license:update-file-header... > All files now have ASF 2.0 license... > > Any other things which i missed ? > > > Kind regards > Karl-Heinz > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
