We should then update a lot of other mojos' source code as well. Most likely we should add a comment on this to the guideline.
Anyone with good license knowledge that could confirm this? On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de>wrote: > Hi Anders, > > > > > >> Something that has always struck me as weird is that the license text we >> add (for ASF license) is "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation >> (ASF) under...". Is this right? Is it licensed to ASF really? >> If you look at the end of the text at >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 we should probably say >> "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2....". >> > > I would suggest to do so ? > > Any objections ? > > If no i will change the license text accordingly... > > > Kind regards > Karl-Heinz Marbaise > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
