Cool, will you pick this up?

Robert

Op Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:30:10 +0100 schreef Jörg Hohwiller <jo...@j-hohwiller.de>:

Am 08.03.2014 12:35, schrieb Robert Scholte:
Hi Jörg,
Hi Robert,

After rescanning the code, I wasn't convinced of embedding/moving the
dependencies from profiles activated by properties of files, because
the result would be different if the original pom.xml was deployed and
Maven would then resolve the dependencies.
So I've added the property embedBuildProfileDependencies with default
false so there's no change of behavior.
OK. As long as it still available as feature it's fine for me. Maybe you
are also right with the default set to false... agreed :)

I've deployed the SNAPSHOT so users can add
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots to their
project and give it a try.

Because there are still some tricky things, I think we should rename
the plugin, just to be safe. The experience we build up with this
plugin should be relevant for the actual implementation at Apache.
I do not mind and this will bring us freedom. Your suggestion was
flatten-pom instead of consumer-pom. So how about flatten-maven-plugin?
The only MOJOs starting with f so far are findbugs-maven-plugin and
fitnesse-maven-plugin (and failsafe in graveyard) so there should be no
clash.

Cheers
   Jörg

Robert


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to