On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:14:19AM -0800, Dan Tran wrote: > Apache process may send some new potential committers away :) > > +1 for Github, but stay together under on umbrella of org.code.mojo > groupId.
+1 The concern with moving to Github is their lack of mailing lists, but I guess a Google group is the best choice these days. > > -D > > btw, i found this https://github.com/codehaus-plexus > > so we may something similar like that? > > > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Tony Chemit <che...@codelutin.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:51:18 +0100 > > Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jore...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I second the opinions for moving to GitHub (or Bitbucket) instead of > > > remaining in SVN. > > > If doing so, I suggest we reuse as much as possible of the GitHub > > > infrastructure - Wiki, Issue Tracker, Mailing lists etc. > > > If we are already bound for some major migrations, let's make the best of > > > them - and a Distributed version control system is a productivity boost. > > > > > > Also - is there really a point to maintain a particular GroupID (i.e. > > > org.codehaus). > > > I belive we could/should move Mojo's development efforts into the Apache > > > umbrella (why have 2 sources of normative plugins - apache and codehaus) > > to > > > simplify for users. > > > > I really like this idea to *merge* mojo projets with maven plugins one or > > something at apache house. > > > > I guess there is some legal issue about it ? or not ? > > > > > > > > -- > > Tony Chemit > > -------------------- > > tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 > > http://www.codelutin.com > > email: che...@codelutin.com > > twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
