2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>: > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit : > > *Project name* > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than later. > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be technical > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use for the > > project. > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after Codehaus EOL > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)? or > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult btw)? Or > > change the project name even more? > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be > precise) > could be "Mojo for Maven" > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name? > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a need for > "XXX > Mojo", whatever XXX is? >
Well, simply because of "googling". Try to find the mojo project by just typing "mojo" :-). As it's a noun, and so on... But, that indeed may not be a big issue since people may be more likely to search foo-maven-plugin. -- Baptiste
