Mailing lists _are_ important. I was not trying to imply that mailing lists
should be dropped, merely stating the fact that the functionality could be
procured elsewhere and plugged into GitHub. If GitHub does not provide enough
flexibility in that respect, then we need to talk to GitHub product team, I am
pretty sure they will be listening to the voice of a large developer community.
--
Sergei
>
>Monday, 2 March 2015 09:54 +0000 from Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@batmat.net>:
>Even if I agree ML shouldn't be an issue. It's not so unimportant for us as a
>developer community. We need a wee bit more than just pushing and reviewing
>code.
>2015-03-02 9:46 GMT+01:00 Sergei Ivanov < sergei_iva...@mail.ru > :
>>Mailing lists are a completely orthogonal feature to the development stack. I
>>am struggling to understand why can they not be hosted somewhere else and why
>>the lack of mailing lists is an impediment to migration to git and GitHub.
>>--
>>Sergei
>>>
>>>Monday, 2 March 2015 08:38 +0000 from Trygve Laugstøl <
>>>tryg...@codehaus.org >:
>>>
>>>On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:14:19AM -0800, Dan Tran wrote:
>>>> Apache process may send some new potential committers away :)
>>>>
>>>> +1 for Github, but stay together under on umbrella of org.code.mojo
>>>> groupId.
>>>+1
>>>The concern with moving to Github is their lack of mailing lists, but I
>>>guess a Google group is the best choice these days.
>>>>
>>>> -D
>>>>
>>>> btw, i found this https://github.com/codehaus-plexus
>>>>
>>>> so we may something similar like that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Tony Chemit < che...@codelutin.com >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:51:18 +0100
>>>> > Lennart Jörelid < lennart.jore...@gmail.com > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > I second the opinions for moving to GitHub (or Bitbucket) instead of
>>>> > > remaining in SVN.
>>>> > > If doing so, I suggest we reuse as much as possible of the GitHub
>>>> > > infrastructure - Wiki, Issue Tracker, Mailing lists etc.
>>>> > > If we are already bound for some major migrations, let's make the best
>>>> > > of
>>>> > > them - and a Distributed version control system is a productivity
>>>> > > boost.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Also - is there really a point to maintain a particular GroupID (i.e.
>>>> > > org.codehaus).
>>>> > > I belive we could/should move Mojo's development efforts into the
>>>> > > Apache
>>>> > > umbrella (why have 2 sources of normative plugins - apache and
>>>> > > codehaus)
>>>> > to
>>>> > > simplify for users.
>>>> >
>>>> > I really like this idea to *merge* mojo projets with maven plugins one or
>>>> > something at apache house.
>>>> >
>>>> > I guess there is some legal issue about it ? or not ?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Tony Chemit
>>>> > --------------------
>>>> > tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
>>>> > http://www.codelutin.com
>>>> > email: che...@codelutin.com
>>>> > twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>--
>Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
>Sauvez un arbre,
>Mangez un castor !
