I am not sure to understand "It is not good to backtracking version.". Does it mean that the version after graduating should show the 'step'? Is that a common way to do it?
Not taking into account the graduation, I would also favor the "0.10.0" instead of "1.0.0". Regards Bertrand On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org>wrote: > I would personally support the idea to have next version to be "0.10.0" > instead of "1.0.0". > > Jarcec > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:42:28AM +0000, Wei, Jianbin wrote: > > It is not good to backtracking version. There is 0.9 out already, > although it is incubating. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jianbin > > > > On Sep 6, 2012, at 17:50, "Jim Donofrio" <donofrio...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I agree but not sure this release should be 1.0.0, I would make it > 0.10.0. I think we wait till there is support for a regular Tool Driver > class for 1.0.0. > > > > > > On 09/06/2012 03:09 PM, Brock Noland wrote: > > >> I'd like to get a release out there this month. There is a ton of > fixes: > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT/fixforversion/12320548#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel > > >> > > >> and of course the API is changing to allow multiple input key/values. > > >> If you want to see something in the 1.0.0 release, please speak up. > > >> > > >> Brock > > >> > > > > -- Bertrand Dechoux
