+1 for the 1.0.0 release. I think it's a good idea to increase the major version number considering the recent graduation and the included changes.
On 7 Sep 2012, at 07:29, "Wei, Jianbin" <jianb...@paypal.com> wrote: > My bad, 0.9.0 --> 0.10.0 is also version increase. My eyes are not used to > have a 2 digits minor version yet. However, I still prefer a one-digit minor > version as most software do that in practice. > > Regards, > > -- Jianbin > > On Sep 6, 2012, at 10:41 PM, Bertrand Dechoux wrote: > > I am not sure to understand "It is not good to backtracking version.". > Does it mean that the version after graduating should show the 'step'? > Is that a common way to do it? > > Not taking into account the graduation, I would also favor the "0.10.0" > instead of "1.0.0". > > Regards > > Bertrand >
