As I understand it, if we implement https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT-138 as described in the JIRA. That is, all the drivers keep state of the inputs, we can undeprecate the methods depcrecated in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT-64?
Brock On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Jim Donofrio <donofrio...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we need to keep those deprecated methods around for awhile, no > reason to anger users. > > > On 09/07/2012 08:35 AM, Bertrand Dechoux wrote: >> >> Then the question is about when/if the compatibility should be broken. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT-139 would be quite easy >> without the history of MRUnit and the @Deprecated.... >> >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Dave Beech <d...@paraliatech.com> wrote: >> >>> I think this depends on what we decide to do about MRUNIT-138. We were >>> discussing an incompatible change, and if we do decide to do that I think >>> the version number should increase to 1.0.0 to reflect this (and also the >>> fact that this is the first version since graduation). >>> >>> If we later go ahead with the API rewrite (MRUNIT-69), this could form >>> MRUnit 2.0.0! Would line up nicely with Hadoop's own numbering strategy >>> ;) >>> >>> On 7 September 2012 07:54, James Kinley <kin...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for the 1.0.0 release. I think it's a good idea to increase the major >>>> version number considering the recent graduation and the included >>> >>> changes. >>>> >>>> On 7 Sep 2012, at 07:29, "Wei, Jianbin" <jianb...@paypal.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My bad, 0.9.0 --> 0.10.0 is also version increase. My eyes are not >>> >>> used >>>> >>>> to have a 2 digits minor version yet. However, I still prefer a >>> >>> one-digit >>>> >>>> minor version as most software do that in practice. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> -- Jianbin >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 6, 2012, at 10:41 PM, Bertrand Dechoux wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure to understand "It is not good to backtracking version.". >>>>> Does it mean that the version after graduating should show the 'step'? >>>>> Is that a common way to do it? >>>>> >>>>> Not taking into account the graduation, I would also favor the "0.10.0" >>>>> instead of "1.0.0". >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Bertrand >>>>> >> >> > -- Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
