Forward my comment in private mail list: I agree that it would be nice to have some quantitative standards to evaluate the candidates. Let's encourage the future candidates do this.
- Ziheng On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 09:44 Mu Li <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems that this thread didn't show in the dev list. > > Totally agree that we should make the committer nomination more formal. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tianqi Chen <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:20 PM > Subject: Formalize Committer Proposal and Application Procedure > To: [email protected] > > > Hi Guys: > As I mentioned in another thread, I personally think the current > committer proposal and application process is too informal. > As MXNet grows larger and the community involves, I think it would be > very helpful to formalize the process and provide a clear standard for what > are we looking for in the comitter proposal process, and allow us to > evaluate based on the concrete evidence listed in the application to > promote the comitters. > This will setup a good standard for the contributors, as well as > provide solid material to back our decisions. After did some search, I > created this application template based on the committer application from > Apache Mesos. I wrote it from the perspective of myself. > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vKTgX1_EkAT7NSmaiBKBmbq > DuhF9kQd53BB4iUxGn4M/edit?usp=sharing > > I would recommend this to become the mandatory thing for the future > committer nomination and voting, as well as the re-evaluation standard of > current comitters when we graduate from the incubator project. > > Tianqi > -- Ziheng Jiang Fudan University | Computer Science
