They're not committers, so I doubt anyone has requested they sign a ICLA. Looking at the GitHub history, some haven't been active in a while.
Hen On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:07 PM, shiwen hu <yajiedes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe they don't know how to start the ICLA process.Consider creating a > boot page. > > 2017-08-30 13:06 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>: > > > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this) > > > > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411 contributors): > > > > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point. > > > > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't > > covered by a CLA: > > > > 8:sneakerkg > > 9:kevinthesun (post Incubation) > > 17:hjk41 > > 18:mavenlin > > 19:tornadomeet > > 20:winstywang > > 21:jermainewang > > 22:qiaohaijun > > 23:vchuravy > > 25:Roshrini (post Incubation) > > 26:howard0su > > 28:sbodenstein > > 31:ptrendx (post Incubation) > > 35:zackchase (post Incubation) > > 36:yanqingmen > > > > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator. > > > > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those above > > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to > > determine how far down the list to go. > > > > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so > > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier. > > > > Hen > > >