*facepalm* Link: https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi tornadomeet :) > > If you could sign this (ink, not typed) and email it to > [email protected] that would be brilliant. > > Thanks, > > Hen > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:19 AM, tornadomeet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hello, i'm tornadomeet, how to sign CLAs? >> >> >> thanks >> >> >> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ >> 发件人: "Henri Yandell";<[email protected]>; >> 发送时间: 2017年8月30日(星期三) 中午1:06 >> 收件人: "dev"<[email protected]>; "John D. Ament"< >> [email protected]>; "Justin Mclean"<[email protected]>; >> >> 主题: ICLAs vs Contributors >> >> >> >> (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this) >> >> Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411 contributors): >> >> We have 36 signed CLAs at this point. >> >> Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't >> covered by a CLA: >> >> 8:sneakerkg >> 9:kevinthesun (post Incubation) >> 17:hjk41 >> 18:mavenlin >> 19:tornadomeet >> 20:winstywang >> 21:jermainewang >> 22:qiaohaijun >> 23:vchuravy >> 25:Roshrini (post Incubation) >> 26:howard0su >> 28:sbodenstein >> 31:ptrendx (post Incubation) >> 35:zackchase (post Incubation) >> 36:yanqingmen >> >> Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator. >> >> Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those above >> are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to >> determine how far down the list to go. >> >> The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so >> doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier. >> >> Hen >> > >
